|
課程名稱 |
社會網絡研究
Study of Social Networks |
|
開課學期 |
108-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學系 |
|
授課教師 |
蘇國賢 |
|
課號 |
Soc3023 |
|
課程識別碼 |
305 32210 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
|
上課地點 |
社207 |
|
備註 |
限學士班二年級以上
總人數上限：70人
外系人數限制：30人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1081Soc3023_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
社會網絡從80年代開始飛速成長，在各領域中蓬勃發展，目前在同一個知識標籤底下，有很多樣的內涵。本課程從社會學中研究社會結構、社區、人群關係、及社會資本的傳統出發，主要關懷社會學的原始提問: 社會變遷如何影響整體社會結構及個人社會網絡的變化。本課程與目前將網絡分析當成技術工具來從事傳播、行銷的分析不同，課程內容也與社群媒體、大數據、人工智慧沒有直接的關聯，純粹是一門關乎社會結構如何形成、演變的科學。想要學習資料分析或社群網絡的同學建議去修習經濟系、新聞所、圖資系、或政治系的相關網絡分析課程。 |
|
課程目標 |
網路分析與傳統社會科學分析的最大的不同點，在於其強調社會結構對行為的影響。傳統的社會科學對行為的分析，大多從行為者本身所具有的屬性(attributes)，或個體從群體得來的衍生屬性(derived attributes)，來將行為者進行社會分類，然後比較這些社會類別之間的差異。例如將人群按照性別、種族來分類，或是以職業、從業身分、權威等工作衍生面向，將人群分成各種階級(class)，來分析這些社會類別如何造成個人生命機會的差異。此種分析邏輯的最大弊病，在於研究者按照各種屬性將人群進行分門別類時(categorization)，會有意無意地扭曲了個體所處的原始社會結構(social structure)，而這些社會結構，往往是影響個體生命機會最重要的脈絡。本課程的目的，是藉由網絡分析的概念來引導學生認識結構分析的基本邏輯及預設，並提供簡單的概念及分析架構，以便讓學生能用結構的思考工具來進行社會結構的分析。主要的內容包含幾大部分:
(1)網絡社會學的發展歷史
(2)結構分析的知識立場
(3)網絡分析的理論觀點與侷限
(4)網絡的資料與方法簡介
(5)社會網絡分析的基本機制:機會、類聚、社會交換、弱連帶與平衡
(6)現代社會中的個人網絡
(7)衝突關係:地位與角色
(8)關係的形成與變化
(9)網絡影響與傳播
(10)網絡與不平等
本課程將努力達成以下幾個目標:
1. 了解網絡分析做為一個新的分析觀點的基本知識論立場
2. 了解網絡分析理論觀點及其侷限
3. 介紹社會網絡的基本概念與方法
4. 瀏覽社會網絡與社會資本研究目前在社會學上的應用
|
|
課程要求 |
本課程為社會學的基礎課程，適合想所有對社會網絡及社會結構有興趣的同學來修讀。選修之學生無須任何程式語言、統計分析或資訊社會學理論等相關課程。上課以討論社會學中的結構分析、個人網絡、社會資本相關領域的研究為範疇，不會涵蓋其他網絡相關領域如線上社會、社群媒體、大數據分析等的討論。想要透過社會網絡來進行大數據分析的同學也建議改修學校其他相關課程。
授課方法：
本課程以演講及閱讀討論為主。每週上課老師會指定必讀及參考文獻，以英文文獻閱讀為主。請同學事先研讀。期中考及期末考為教室筆試，考試內容為上課閱讀及老師講義內容。期末考之後須交研究報告一份。
成績評量及分配方式：
平時上課10%
期中考筆試30%
期末考筆試30%
期末報告30%
|
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週二 17:30~18:30 |
|
指定閱讀 |
Textbooks: 每週閱讀的內容主要採自以下幾本教科書，所有指定閱讀會在上課前上網。也歡迎大家自行上網購買原文書。
Hedstrom, Peter. Dissecting the social: on the principle of Analytical Sociology. Perry, Brea L. Bernice A. Pescosolido, & Stephen P. Borgatti. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Knoke, David and Song Yang, 2007. Social Network Analysis. Second Edition,
Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
|
參考書目 |
理論相關參考書:
Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press.
Hedstrom, Peter. Dissecting the social: on the principle of Analytical
Sociology.
Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis:
Methods and Applications.
Perry, Brea L. Bernice A. Pescosolido, & Stephen P. Borgatti. 2018. Egocentric
Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Knoke, David and Song Yang, 2007. Social Network Analysis. Second Edition,
分析方法相關參考書
Borgatti, Stephen and Martin Everett. 2013. Analyzing Social Networks. Los
Angeles: Sage Publication.
Scott, John and Peter J. Carrington. ed. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Social
Network Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
de Nooy, Wouter, ANdrej Mrvar, Vldimir Batagelj, Exploratory Social Network
Analysis with Pajek.
Hanneman, Robert A. and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network
methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside ( published in
digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/)
應用類參考文獻
Easley, David and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets:
Reasonsing about a Highly Connected World. Cambrdige University Press.
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/
Fischer, Claudes S. 2011. Still Connected: Family and Friends in American
Since 1970. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Halpern, David. 2005. Social Capital. Polity Press.
Rainie, Lee and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating
System. Cambridge: MIT press.
Lin, Nan. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Charles Kadushin. 2012. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and
Findings.
Small, Mario Luis. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in
Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University press.
Centola, Damon. 2018. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
Bearman, Peter, and Peter Hedstrom (eds) 2011. The Oxford Handbook of
Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Computer software:
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. Ucinet for Windows: Software
for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/home
Pajek http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/default.htm
Borgatti, SP. 2006. E-Net https://sites.google.com/site/enetsoftware1/Home |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
平時上課 |
10% |
|
2. |
期中筆試 |
30% |
測驗上課指定閱讀及講義 |
3. |
期末筆試 |
30% |
測驗上課指定閱讀及講義 |
4. |
期末報告 |
30% |
修課同學必須使用上課所教授的網絡分析概念、工具或理論觀點，撰寫一份具有實證研究或田野研究的報告。期末報告的主題需在期中之前與老師討論，期中考時要交一份報告大綱。報告的撰寫須依照研究方法課程的學術研究標準，違反一般學術倫理規範一律以不及格論。報告的長度最少五千字，上限為八千字，不含文獻、圖表及摘要。 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
|
課程介紹
社會網絡的發展史
The development of Social Network Analysis
Book review on Linton C. Freeman. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC (2004) Social Networks 27(4):377–384
有興趣了解詳細的學術史的同學可以參考附檔的全書。 |
|
第2週 |
|
生成概念與結構的主題: 人
The concept of emergence and personhood
Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chapter 1, 2 |
|
第3週 |
|
結構分析導論Introduction to Structural Analysis
Perry, Brea L. Bernice A. Pescosolido, & Stephen P. Borgatti. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
參考：
*Wellman, Barry. 1988. "Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance.” Pp. 19-61 in Social Structures: A Network Approach, edited by B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Bruce Mayhew. 1980. Structuralism vs. Individualism. Social Forces. Vol 59 (2): Pp. 335-375
*Emirbayer, M. 1997. "Manifesto for Relational Sociology." American Journal of Sociology 103:281-317.
*Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Chapter 1
*Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1940. "On Social Structure.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland 70:1-12.
*S. F. Nadel, Social Structure, 1-19, 62-73, 79-92, 97-104, 147-152.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press. Chapter 1, 9.
|
|
第4週 |
|
分析社會學與社會機制
Analytical Sociology and Mechanism
Hedstrom, Peter. Dissecting the social: on the principle of Analytical Sociology. Chapter 3.
*Daniel Little. 2012. Analytical Sociology and the Rest of Sociology. Sociologica.
*Gianluca Manzo. Analytical Sociology and Its Critics. European Journal of Sociology. |
|
第5週 |
|
基本網絡概念與測量
Basic Network Concepts and Measurement
Knoke and Yang. 2007. Social Network Analysis. Second Edition. Sage Publication.
*Wasserman, Stanley, and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Pp. 28-66.
*Hanneman, Robert A. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods . Chapter 3-6 .
*Yang-chih Fu.2005.Measuring personal networks with daily contacts: a single-item survey question and the contact diary. Social Networks 27:169–186.
*Kuo-Hsien Su, Nan Lin. 2013. Status-based Differential Memory and Measurement of Social Capital: Recall Errors and Bias Estimations. Social Capital and Its Institutional Contingency: A Study of the United States, China, and Taiwan. New York: Routledge. 2013: 64-80.
*Borgatti, Everett, and Johnson. 2013. Analyzing Social Networks. Chapter 3-5.
*Marsden, Peter V. "Survey Methods for Network Data." In The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis.
*Marsden, Peter V. "Network Data and Measurement." Annual Review of Sociology.
*Marsden, Peter V. "Recent Development in Network Measurement." In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis.
|
|
第6週 |
|
網絡資料的蒐集
Network research design |
|
第7週 |
|
類聚與關係的形成 Homophily
Blau, Peter M. 1977. A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure. American Journal of Sociology 83: 26-54.
*Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.
*Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and J. M. Cook. 2001. "Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks." Annual Review of Sociology 27:415-44.
*Rivera, M. T., et al. (2010). Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 36. K. S. Cook and D. S. Massey. 36: 91-115.
*Small, Mario L. and Laura Adler. 2019. "The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties." Annual Review of Sociology 45(1):111-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022707.
*Kandel, Denise. 1978. "Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships."American Journal of Sociology 84, 2: 427-436.
|
|
第7週 |
|
社會網絡資料分析
Borgatti, Stephen. Martin Everett, Jeffrey Johnson. 2013. Analyzing Social Networks. LA: Sage Publications. |
|
第8週 |
|
Egocentric Network Analysis
https://sites.google.com/site/enetsoftware1/download
弱連帶與結構動
Weak Ties and Structural Holes
Granovetter, Mark S. 1977. "The Strength of Weak Ties."American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360-1380. Also in LienhardtÌs Social Networks, pp 347-367.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Pp.8-81.
*Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. "The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Pp. 105-130 in Social Structure and Network Analysis, edited by Marsden Peter and Nan Lin. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
*Granovetter, Mark S. 1995 (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
第9週 |
|
期中考
繳交期末報告大綱
個人核心網絡的分析
Analysis of Egocentric Network
Perry, Brea L. Bernice A. Pescosolido, & Stephen P. Borgatti. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
第10週 |
|
核心網絡規模的變化 Changes in Personal Network
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin and Matthew E. Brashears. 2006. "Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades." American Sociological Review 71(3):353-75.
蘇國賢. 2019. 臺灣個人網絡的變化-1997-2017.
*Marsden, P. V. 1987. "Core Discussion Networks of Americans." American Sociological Review 52(1):122-31.
*Scott Feld. 1991. "Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do." American Journal of Sociology 96:1464-77.
*Ishiguro, Itaru. 2018. Changes in Core Network Size in Japan: Comparisons between the 1990s and 2010s. Social Networks, 52: 270-281.
*Fischer, Claude S. 2009. "The 2004 GSS Finding of Shrunken Social Networks: An Artifact?". American Sociological Review 74(4):657-69.
*McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin and Matthew E. Brashears. 2009. "Models and Marginals: Using Survey Evidence to Study Social Networks." American Sociological Review 74(4):670-81
*Fischer, Claudes S. 2011. Still Connected: Family and Friends in American Since 1970. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
*Fisher, Cluade S. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Pp.45-76, 251-266.
*Putnam, Robert. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: A Touchstone Book.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1984. "Network Items and the General Social Survey.” Social Networks 6:293-339.
*Small, Mario L. 2017. Someone to Talk To. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1990. "Kinds of Relations in American Discussion Networks.” in Structures of Power and Constraint: Paper in Honor of Peter M. Blau, edited by C. Calhoun, Marchall W. Meyer and W. Richard Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
|
第11週 |
|
個人網絡結構的變化
Jeffrey A. Smith, Miller McPherson, and Lynn Smith-Lovin. 2014. Social Distance in the United States: Sex, Race, Religion, Age, and Education Homophily among Confidants, 1985 to 2004. American Sociological Review 2014, Vol. 79(3) 432–456
*Bernice A. Pescosolido and Beth A. Rubin. 2000. The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology. American Sociological Review, Vol. 65, No. 1
*Georg Simmel, 1922. Web of Group Affiliation. In Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations.
*Beata Dávid, Eva Huszti, Ildikó Barna, Yang-chih Fu. 2016. Egocentric contact networks in comparison: Taiwan and Hungary. Social Networks 44: 253-265
*Rainie, Lee and Barry Wellman. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge: MIT press.
|
|
第12週 |
|
Relationship Across Life Course
McFarland, D. A., J. Moody, D. Diehl, J. A. Smith, and R. J. Thomas. 2014. "Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure." American Sociological Review 79(6):1088-121.
( 讀到 1094頁， research design and data 之前）
*Giordano, P. C. 2003. "Relationships in Adolescence." Annual Review of Sociology 29:257-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100047.
*Frank, Kenneth A., Chandra Muller, and Anna S. Mueller. 2013. "The Embeddedness of Adolescent Friendship Nominations: The Formation of Social Capital in Emergent Network Structures." American Journal of Sociology 119(1):216-53.
*Sassler, S. 2010. "Partnering across the Life Course: Sex, Relationships, and Mate Selection." Journal of Marriage and Family 72(3):557-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00718.x.
*Swartz, Teresa Toguchi. 2009. "Intergenerational Family Relations in Adulthood: Patterns, Variations, and Implications in the Contemporary United States." Pp. 191-212 in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 35, Annual Review of Sociology.
*Umberson, Debra, Robert Crosnoe and Corinne Reczek. 2010. "Social Relationships and Health Behavior across the Life Course." Pp. 139-57 in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 36, Vol. 36, Annual Review of Sociology, edited by K. S. Cook and D. S. Massey.
*Lusher Dean, Johan Koskinen, Garry Robins, Exponential Random Graph Models of Social Networks: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
*Rivera, Mark T., Sara B. Soderstrom and Brian Uzzi. 2010. "Dynamics of Dyads in Social Networks: Assortative, Relational, and Proximity Mechanisms." Pp. 91-115 in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 36.
|
|
第13週 |
|
親密關係的形成 Intimate Relationship
Tillman, Kathryn Harker, Karin L. Brewster and Giuseppina Valle Holway. 2019. "Sexual and Romantic Relationships in Young Adulthood." Annual Review of Sociology 45(1):133-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022625.
*Su, Kuo-Hsien 2018. Formation and dissolution of Romantic Relationships in Taiwan. |
|
第14週 |
|
結構同位與競爭關係 Conflict as Sociation
Chen, Ming-Jer, Kuo-hsien Su, Wenpin Tsai, Competitive Tension: The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 1, pp101-118
*Wenpin Tsai, Kuo-Hsien Su, Ming-Jer Chen, Seeing Through the Eyes of a Rival: Competitor Acumen Based on Rival-Centric Perceptions, Academy of Management Journal, 4, pp761-778
*Kalyvas, Stathis. 2009. Conflict. In Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology.
*Breiger, Ronald L. 1974. "The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Force 53:181-190.
*J. Miller McPherson, "Voluntary Affiliation: A Structural Approach," in Peter Blau and Robert Merton (eds.), Continuities in Structural Inquiry, chap. 11:325-51.
|
|
第15週 |
|
傳播效應
Social Contagion and Diffusion Process
Centola, Damon. 2018. How Behavior Spreads: The Science of Complex Contagions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
*Moody, James, 2003. Network Dynamics. In Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Chapter 19.
*Coleman, James, Elihu Katz, and Herbert Menzel. 1957. “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians.” Sociometry 20: 253-270.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1987. "Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence.” American Journal of Sociology 92:1287-1335.
*Wang, Dan J. and Sarah A. Soule. 2012. "Social Movement Organizational Collaboration: Networks of Learning and the Diffusion of Protest Tactics, 1960-1995." American Journal of Sociology 117(6):1674-722. doi: 10.1086/664685.
*Noah Friedkin. 1993. “Structural Bases of Interpersonal Influence in Groups.” American Sociological Review 58:862-872.
*Wejnert, Barbara. 2004. Assessing “Integrating Models of Diffusion of Innovations: A Conceptual Framework. Annual Review of Sociology 297-
*Mizruchi, M. S. 1993. "Cohesion, Equivalence and Similarity of Behavior: a Theoretical and Empirical Assessment." Social Networks 15:275-307.
*Burt, Ronald S. 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 173-191,211-213, 215-262.
*Duncan, O. D., A. O. Haller and A. Portes. 1968. "Peer Influence on Aspirations: A Reinterpretation," American Journal of Sociology 74:119-137.
|
|
第16週 |
|
結構與不平等 Network and Inequality
DiMaggio, Paul and Filiz Garip. 2012. "Network Effects and Social Inequality." Pp. 93-118 in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol 38, Vol. 38, Annual Review of Sociology, edited by K. S. Cook and D. S. Massey.
*Small, Mario Luis. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University press.
*Emily Erikson and Nicholas Occhiuto. 2017. Social Networks and Macrosocial Change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2017. 43:229–48
*Roger Gould, 2002. “The Evolution of Status Hierarchies.” American Journal of Sociology 107: 1143-1178
|
|
第17週 |
|
結構取向的批判
Smith, Christian. 2010. What is a Person? Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Chapter 4, 6
*Breiger, Ronald. 2004. “The Analysis of Social Networks, pp505-526 in Handbook of Data Analysis, edited by Melissa Hardy and Alan Bryman. London: Sage Publication. |
|
第18週 |
|
期末考
期末報告繳交日期 |
|